Smt. Chinamma Basappa Patil, Arts & Commerce Degree College, Chincholi

Established in 1983
Affiliated to Gulbarga University, Kalaburagi and
NAAC Accreditation B+ Grade

☰ MENU

NAAC-Criterias Reports 

CRITERIA I 

Quantitative Criterion – I

Criterion – I- Curricular Aspects

SL .No

Metric Question

Link

1.2.1

 QnM

Number of Add on /Certificate/Value added programs offered during the last five years

View

1.2.2

  QnM

Percentage of students enrolled in Certificate/ Add-on/Value added programs as against the total number of students during the last five years

View

1.3.2.

QnM

Percentage of students undertaking project work/field work/ internships (Data for the latest completed academic year)

View

 

1.4.1.

QnM

Institution obtains feedback on the academic performance and ambience of the institution from various stakeholders, such as Students, Teachers, Employers, Alumni etc. and action taken report on the feedback is made available on  institutional website (Yes or No)

View

 

Qualitative Criterion – I

Criterion – I - Curricular Aspects

SL .No

Metric Question

Link

1.1.1

QlM

The Institution ensures effective curriculum planning and delivery through a well-planned and documented process including Academic calendar and conduct of continuous internal Assessment

View

1.3.1.

QlM

Institution integrates crosscutting issues relevant to Professional Ethics,  Gender, Human Values, Environment and Sustainability into the Curriculum

View

   

View

CRITERIA II

Quantitative Criterion – II

Criterion – II - Teaching, Learning and Evaluation

 

SL .No

Metric Question

Link

2.1.1.

QnM

Average Enrolment percentage (Average of last five years)

2.1.1.1. Number  of students admitted year wise during last five years

2.1.1.2. Number of sanctioned seats year wise during last five years

View

2.1.2

 

QnM

Percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable reservation policy during the last five years (Exclusive of supernumerary seats)

View

2.2.1.

QnM

Student – Full time Teacher Ratio

(Data for the latest completed academic year)

View

2.4.1.

QnM

Percentage of full-time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years

View

2.4.2.

QnM

Percentage of full time teachers with NET/SET/SLET/ Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the last five years  (consider only highest degree for count)

View

2.6.2.

 

 

 

QnM

Pass percentage of Students during last five years 

2.6.2.1. Number of final year students who passed the university examination year wise during the last five years

View

2.7.1

QnM

Online student satisfaction survey regarding to teaching learning process.(Online survey to be conducted)

http://cbpdc.hkes.edu.in/files/criteria%202%20%20SSR.pdf

 

 

Qualitative Criterion – II

Criterion – II - Teaching, Learning and Evaluation

SL .No

Metric Question

Link

2.3.1.

QlM

Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences using ICT tools

View

2.5.1.

QlM

Mechanism of internal/ external assessment is transparent and the grievance redressal system is time- bound and efficient

View

2.6.1.

 

QlM

 

Programme Outcomes (POs) and Course Outcomes (COs) for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website and attainment of POs and COs are evaluated

Write description in a maximum of 500 words

 

 

CRITERIA III

Quantitative Criterion – III

Criterion – III - Research, Innovations and Extension

SL .No

Metric Question

Link

3.1.3

Number of Seminars/conferences/workshops conducted by the institution

View

3.2.1

Number of papers published per teacher in the Journals

View

3.2.2

Number of books and chapters in edited volumes/books published and papers published in national/ international conference proceedings

View

3.3.3

Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the institution through NSS/NCC/Red cross/YRC etc.

View

3.3.4

Average percentage of students participating in extension activities at 3.3.3

View

3.4.1

The Institution has several collaborations/linkages

 

Qualitative Criterion – III

Criterion – III - Research, Innovations and Extension

SL .No

Metric Question

Link

3.3.1

Extension activities are carried out in the neighborhood community, sensitizing students to social issues, for their holistic development

View

CRITERIA IV

Quantitative Criterion – IV

Criterion – IV - Infrastructure and Learning Resources

SL .No

Metric Question

Link

4.1.4

Average percentage of expenditure, excluding salary for infrastructure augmentation

View

4.2.3

Average annual expenditure for purchase of books/e-books and subscription to journals/e- journals

View

4.3.3

Bandwidth of internet connection in the Institution

View

4.4.1

Average percentage of expenditure incurred on maintenance of infrastructure

View

Qualitative Criterion – IV

Criterion – IV - Infrastructure and Learning Resources

SL .No

Metric Question

Link

4.1.1

The Institution has adequate infrastructure and physical facilities for teaching- learning. viz., classrooms, laboratories, computing equipment etc.

View

4.4.2

There are established systems and procedures for maintaining and utilizing physical, academic and support facilities

View

 

CRITERIA V

Quantitative Criterion – V

Criterion – V - Student Support and Progression

SL .No

Metric Question

Link

5.1.1

Average percentage of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the Government during last five years

View

5.1.4

Average percentage of students benefitted by guidance for competitive examinations and career counselling offered by the Institution

View

5.2.1

Average percentage of placement of outgoing students during the last five year

View

5.2.2

Average percentage of students progressing to higher education during the last five years

View

5.3.3

Average number of sports and cultural events/competitions in which students of the Institution participated during last five years

View

CRITERIA VI

Quantitative Criterion – VI

Criterion – VI - Governance, Leadership and Management

SL .No

Metric Question

Link

6.3.4

Average percentage of teachers undergoing online/face-to-face Faculty development Programmes (FDP)

View

Qualitative Criterion – VI

Criterion – VI - Governance, Leadership and Management

SL .No

Metric Question

Link

6.1.2

The effective leadership is visible in various institutional practices such as decentralization and participative management.

View

CRITERIA VII

Qualitative Criterion – VII

Criterion – VII - Institutional Values and Best Practices

SL .No

Metric Question

Link

7.1.1

Measures initiated by the Institution for the promotion of gender equity

View

7.1.3

Describe the facilities in the Institution for the management

View